Read the complete methods, findings, and discussion in the published PDF.
Generative AI in Physiotherapy Education: Opportunities, Challenges and Future Directions – A Narrative Review
Abstract
Background Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is becoming increasingly popular in healthcare education. Tools, notably ChatGPT, are being utilized by students and educators to support learning, find information, and improve understanding of deep and complex concepts. As the use of AI continues to grow, it is important to understand both its benefits and challenges.
Aims and objectives: This review aimed to explore the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in healthcare education, with a focus on its applications, advantages, limitations, and future potential. A rigorous literature search was conducted using articles identified from PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus Studies related to Artificial Intelligence and Generative AI in healthcare education were reviewed and analyzed for the purpose of this paper.
Methods This narrative review was revised in alignment with the Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles (SANRA). The authors’ original search covered PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for English-language literature from January 2023 through June 2026. Of 816 records identified, 765 were screened and 57 were included. A targeted evidence update using SciSpace and Scite on 14 August 2026 added recent, directly relevant physiotherapy studies and current guidance. Evidence was interpreted according to study design, directness to physiotherapy education, comparator, and outcome type no meta analysis was undertaken.
Results Physiotherapy specific evidence remains limited but expanding. The reviewed studies revealed that GenAI can support learning by helping students access information quickly, grasp complex concepts, prepare study materials, and improve clinical reasoning skills. Transfer evidence from medical education suggests potential for simulated patient encounters and structured feedback. However, concerns were also reported, including inaccurate information, hallucinations, plagiarism, privacy issues, and overreliance on AI tools, data fabrication.
Conclusions Generative Artificial Intelligence has the potential to become a useful tool in healthcare education. While it offers many benefits for both students and educators, it should be used carefully and responsibly. Policymakers and educators need to critically analyse and set guidelines to ensure ethical use of GenAI. Further research is needed to better understand its long term impact on teaching and learning.
Keywords
Authors & affiliations
Cite this article
Gurjot Singh, Akansha Singh, NS Trivedi, Sougata Panda, Vaneet Kumar. Generative AI in Physiotherapy Education: Opportunities, Challenges and Future Directions – A Narrative Review. ClinSphere Journals. 2026;1(1). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22868284
References
- Rabbani SA, El-Tanani M, Sharma S, Rabbani SS, El-Tanani Y, Kumar R, et al. Generative Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Applications, Implementation Challenges, and Future Directions. BioMedInformatics. 2025 Jul 7;5(3):37. doi:10.3390/biomedinformatics5030037
- Sallam M, Salim NA, Barakat M, Al-Mahzoum K, Al-Tammemi AB, Malaeb D, et al. Assessing Health Students’ Attitudes and Usage of ChatGPT in Jordan: Validation Study. JMIR Med Educ. 2023 Sep 5;9:e48254. doi:10.2196/48254
- Dong C, Aw DCW, Lee DWC, Low SC, Yan CC. Generative AI in Healthcare: Insights from Health Professions Educators and Students. Int Med Educ. 2025 Apr 18;4(2):11. doi:10.3390/ime4020011
- Kasneci E, Sessler K, Fischer F, Gasser U, Groh G. ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education.
- Basil M, Ahmed W, Hajeomar R, Strawbridge J, Lynch M, Mukhalalati B. A scoping review of the use of generative artificial intelligence tools in health profession education. BMC Med Educ. 2026 Jan 23;26(1):291. doi:10.1186/s12909-025-08527-3
Open knowledge. Shared impact.
Published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. Authors retain copyright.
View original publication