Independent research. Shared knowledge. Better health.
Review Articles Open access

Pharmacogenomics and Precision Medicine: From GeneticTesting to Individualized Pharmacotherapy

PUBLISHED30 October 2026
VOLUME / ISSUE— / —
AUTHORS01
DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER10.5281/zenodo.23803482
ARTICLE OVERVIEW
THE RESEARCH AT A GLANCE

Abstract

Pharmacogenomics (PGx) examines how inherited genetic variation influences drug exposure, efficacy, and toxicity. Genetic results can guide treatment when the gene-drug relationship is clinically valid, actionable, and interpreted in the context of the patient and the intended use. This narrative review summarizes the path from testing and genotype interpretation to individualized pharmacotherapy, highlighting implementation evidence, guideline resources, and barriers to equitable routine care. Established examples include HLA-B*57:01 testing to prevent abacavir hypersensitivity; TPMT and NUDT15-guided thiopurine dosing; CYP2C19-guided selection of antiplatelet therapy; DPYD-informed fluoropyrimidine dosing; and CYP2D6-guided use of codeine and tramadol. The FDA’s current pharmacogenetic association table distinguishes associations with therapeutic-management recommendations from those supported only by pharmacokinetic evidence, underscoring that a gene-drug association does not automatically justify testing. The PREPARE implementation trial reported fewer clinically relevant adverse drug reactions among patients with actionable gene-drug pairs receiving a pre-emptive 12-gene panel, while trials in specific settings show that clinical utility varies with population, comparator, outcome, and implementation. Testing alone is insufficient: assay coverage, phenotype translation, ancestry-related allele representation, drug interactions, clinical decision support, result portability, informed consent, and clinician education all influence benefit. PGx is most effective when integrated with medication review, clinical monitoring, patient preferences, and evidence-based guidelines, rather than treated as a stand-alone prescribing algorithm. Further pragmatic research should assess long-term outcomes, costs, equity, and workflow effects across diverse health systems.

Continue to the full study

Read the complete methods, findings, and discussion in the published PDF.

EXPLORE RELATED TOPICS

Keywords

BEHIND THE RESEARCH

Authors & affiliations

01

Khushi Malik

Clinical Pharmacist, Dhiraj Hospital, Vadodara, Gujarat, India

BUILD ON THIS WORK

Cite this article

Khushi Malik. Pharmacogenomics and Precision Medicine: From GeneticTesting to Individualized Pharmacotherapy. ClinSphere Journals. 2026;undefined(undefined). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23803482
THE EVIDENCE BASE

References

14 sources
  1. US Food and Drug Administration. Table of pharmacogenetic associations. Silver Spring (MD): FDA; updated 2026 Sep 10. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/precision-medicine/table-pharmacogenetic-associations.
  2. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC). Guidelines. Available from: https://cpicpgx.org/guidelines/. Accessed 2026 Oct 30.
  3. Yang JJ, Landier W, Yang W, Liu C, Hageman L, Cheng C, et al. Inherited NUDT15 variant is a genetic determinant of mercaptopurine intolerance in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(11):1235-1242. doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.59.4671.
  4. Lee CR, Luzum JA, Sangkuhl K, Gammon RS, Sabatine MS, Stein CM, et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guideline for CYP2C19 genotype and clopidogrel therapy: 2022 update. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022;112(5):959-967. doi:10.1002/cpt.2526.
  5. Mallal S, Phillips E, Carosi G, Molina JM, Workman C, Tomažič J, et al. HLA-B*5701 screening for hypersensitivity to abacavir. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(6):568-579. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0706135.

Open knowledge. Shared impact.

Published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. Authors retain copyright.